UABUnbiased AI BenchGlass box for model evals.
Every leaderboard, with receipts.
Home/Compare
Compare
Live · updated continuously
Compare · decision workspace

Compare finalists, not just two rows at a time.

This compare surface is built for shortlist decisions: shared evidence, obvious gaps, tie-heavy areas, and the current leader under a visible decision mode.
Selected models · 1
Shared benchmarks · 23
Current leader · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Workspace controls

Keep the decision frame explicit.

Mode and preset stay visible up top. Shortlist edits, saves, follows, and links stay available without running the page.

Current frameBest for this use caseCoding copilot · Combined public record
Decision mode
Preset

Keep the same finalists, change the weighting, and recompute the decision read without resetting the workspace.

Evidence mode
Shortlist models

Keep the compare set tight. Add one finalist at a time, then prune aggressively.

1 / 6 finalists
Workspace utilities

Save, follow, or copy this exact setup only after the shortlist looks right.

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Save or share this workspacefollow it, copy it, or reopen it later
Open evidence pageOpen workspaces
Decision read

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.

Read this page as a workspace for choosing between finalists, not as a universal crown. The current frame is Coding copilot under best for this use case.

Visible tradeoffsThe current evidence supports a shortlist, not a single winner.
Leader under this modeGemini 2.5 Pro
Closest counter-caseNo clear runner-up on this surface
Shared benchmark surface23 shared benchmarks · 0 tie-heavy
Evidence modeCombined public record
Why the leader is ahead
Document understanding · Vision understanding
Where the evidence is thin
0 tie-heavy benchmarks and 17 missing leader rows keep this from reading as a settled public answer.
What to do next
Inspect decisive benchmarks first, then open the disagreement page or pairwise debates if the top line still feels too narrow.
Open evidence pageInspect benchmark disagreement
23 of 40 benchmarks
Text Arena
AR · rating
Text · Chat / text
1,46097.2%
n/a
Code Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,2038.3%
n/a
Vision Arena
AR · rating
Vision · Vision understanding
1,24688.1%
n/a
WebDev Arena
AR · rating
Code · Coding
1,2038.3%
n/a
Search Arena
AR · rating
Search · Search / tool use
1,14333.3%
n/a
Document Arena
AR · rating
Document · Document understanding
1,42927.8%
n/a
Coding
LB · %
Code · Coding
85.9%100%
n/a
Reasoning
LB · %
Text · Reasoning / math / science
71.6%96.8%
n/a
Language
LB · %
Text · Chat / text
68.5%96.8%
n/a
Instruction following
LB · %
Text · Chat / text
81%80.6%
n/a
Coding generation
LB · %
Code · Coding
89.7%100%
n/a
Coding completion
LB · %
Code · Coding
82%100%
n/a
Intelligence Index
AA · index
Text · Chat / text
3067%
n/a
Time to first token
AA · s
Text · Chat / text
24.44s7.5%
n/a
Terminal-Bench 2.0
TERMINAL-BENCH · %
Code · Coding
32.6%39.1%
n/a
EnigmaEval
SL · %
Text · Reasoning / math / science
66%86.7%
n/a
VISTA
SL · %
Vision · Vision understanding
82%100%
n/a
TutorBench
SL · %
Text · Reasoning / math / science
55.7%90%
n/a
VTB
SL · %
Vision · Vision understanding
11.8%27.3%
n/a
PRBench Legal
SL · %
Text · Professional reasoning
41.4%33.3%
n/a
MASK
SL · %
Text · Safety
55.7%38.5%
n/a
MultiNRC
SL · %
Text · Reasoning / math / science
45.1%10%
n/a
Multimodal mix
OC · %
Document · Document understanding
78.3%100%
n/a
Decisive benchmarks

What is doing the visible work

Text Arena
AR · spread n/a · rating
Code Arena
AR · spread n/a · rating
Vision Arena
AR · spread n/a · rating
Decision pressure

What changes the winner

Gemini 2.5 Pro
17 visible benchmark gaps still leave room for the result to move.
Coverage gaps

Where evidence is missing

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Missing visible evidence on this compare surface
17
Preset interpretation

How this weighting reads the field

The current decision mode is grounded in the Coding copilot preset. This keeps the compare page connected to a visible use case instead of an unspoken “overall winner” claim.

score = 1.45 × coding + 1.05 × reasoning math science + 0.80 × long contextcoverage floor = 55% · recency window = 120 days
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
26.8%
Share or publish this compare resultlinks, copy, and advanced framings
Share this artifact

Publish the claim after the evidence, not before it.

Keep the receipts page and card handy, then use the advanced framings only when you actually need them. Share stays available without becoming the page.

Compare artifactGemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.

0 shared benchmarks are still tie-heavy, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses the combined public record, with hybrid receipts labeled separately.

Evidence page/artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Card image/api/og?kind=compare&models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Public links

Open or copy the stable surfaces

The receipts page is the canonical evidence surface. The card image is the compact preview for embeds, screenshots, and social cards.

Open evidence pageOpen card preview
Copy-ready text

Use the exact public framing

Each copy action keeps the claim attached to receipts instead of forcing you into a blank composer.

Advanced framings and X composerNeutral, contrarian, open-model, and skeptical variants
Compare artifact

Pick the voice before you post

Use the framing variants only when you need them. The artifact page and the public copy actions above should handle most cases.

Neutral analystLead with the claim, then attach the reason and caveat.Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
ContrarianPush against the easy read and keep the counter-case live.Contrarian take: Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
Open-model angleBias the framing toward the open-weight or transparent-evidence angle.Open-model angle: Compare artifact · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Don't trust the headlineLead with the caveat before you let the claim travel.Don't trust the headline: Compare artifact · Gemini 2.5 Pro
X composer

Compose a post that keeps the caveat attached

The post shell always exposes the headline, why, caveat, receipts link, and an optional reply-bait angle.

HeadlineGemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
WhyAR · spread n/a · rating
Caveat0 shared benchmarks are still tie-heavy, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses the combined public record, with hybrid receipts labeled separately.
Receipts link/artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
PreviewOver 280
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads this compare set for coding copilot.
AR · spread n/a · rating
Caveat: 0 shared benchmarks are still tie-heavy, so the win stays conditional. This compare uses the combined public record, with hybrid receipts labeled separately.
Receipts: /artifacts/compare?models=gemini-2-5-pro&mode=best-for-this-use-case&preset=coding-copilot
Open in XOpen card preview
Reading guide

How to read this workspace

Who wins most oftenBenchmarks with one clear percentile leader.Missing evidenceBenchmarks where a finalist is absent from the visible surface.Decision readA shortlist claim tied to an explicit preset and mode.